Webb v. State of Washington et al
| David Q Webb |
| State of Washington, Kitsap County, Chad M Enright, Jennie E Christensen, Kevin M Anderson, Curt William Schulz, Paul D Thimons, Nicholas Joseph Dupont and John Scott Bougher |
| 3:2023cv06034 |
| November 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| David G Estudillo |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER ALLOWING AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RENOTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #1 ) is RENOTED to 1/19/2024 and Plaintiff's proposed amended complaint, if any, IS DUE on or before 1/19/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. (AMD) (cc: Pltf via USPS)
|
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET, filed by Plaintiff David Q Webb. (MW) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge David W. Christel. ***Action Required*** Civil Cover Sheet Omitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge David W. Christel filed by David Q Webb. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint)(MW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
