Recinos v. State of Washington et al
Plaintiff: Tiffany Recinos
Defendant: Washington State, Pierce County Superior Court, US District Court, Mike Kreidler, State of Washington and United States District Court
Case Number: 3:2023cv06086
Filed: November 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: David G Estudillo
Referring Judge: Benjamin H Settle
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2024 Filing 11 MANDATE OF USCA (23-3955) as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Tiffany Recinos. The #9 judgment of this Court, entered December 15, 2023, takes effect this date. This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. DISMISSED (AMD)
December 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 VEXATIOUS LITIGANT BAR ORDER, signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle.(AMD)
December 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF USCA (23-3955) as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Tiffany Recinos. A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal does not challenge a final order entered by the district court. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this appeal. DISMISSED (AMD) Modified on 1/8/2024 (AMD).
December 11, 2023 Filing 8 OBJECTIONS re #5 Judgment by Court, filed by Plaintiff Tiffany Recinos. (MW)
December 5, 2023 Filing 7 TIME SCHEDULE ORDER/USCA CASE NUMBER 23-3955 as to #6 Notice of Appeal filed by Tiffany Recinos. (MW)
December 5, 2023 Filing 5 JUDGMENT BY COURT. Recinos's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend. This case is closed. (MW)
December 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. Recinos's #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend. The Court will not entertain further filings in this case, other than a notice of appeal of this Order. The Clerk shall enter a JUDGMENT and close the case. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
December 4, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL (23-3955) to Ninth Circuit by Plaintiff Tiffany Recinos. (cc: USCA) (MW) Modified to add CCA# on 12/6/2023 (MW).
December 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ENTER BAR ORDER. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff Recinos to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should not issue a Bar Order finding Recinos to be a vexatious litigant. Her response is due no later than 21 days from the date of this Order. She may file it in this case or any other, but she need not file it in each case. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle. (MW)
November 30, 2023 Case Reassigned to Judge Benjamin H. Settle. U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo no longer assigned to the case. (MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
November 28, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge David W. Christel filed by Tiffany Recinos. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Motion to Appoint Counsel)(MW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Recinos v. State of Washington et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Recinos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pierce County Superior Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US District Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Kreidler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States District Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?