Case Number: 3:2002cv00048
Filed: January 24, 2002
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
Presiding Judge: Barbara B. Crabb
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 349 FINAL JUDGMENT entered in favor of plaintiffs declaring that plaintiff Neil Gaiman is a joint 50% owner of the copyrights to the publications Spawn issues 9 and 26 and Angela issues 1, 2 and 3 and the content of those publications, with the respective future rights and obligations of the parties with respect hereto being resolved under the terms of their settlement agreement. All remaining claims and counterclaims dismissed with prejudice. (BBC/PAO) (arw)
March 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 286 ORDER denying 272 Motion to Amend/Correct Second Amended Judgment and Order Denying Fees as to Defendants Image Comics, Inc., Todd McFarlane, Todd McFarlane Productions, Inc. The parties may have until 7/17/2010 to complete an accounting of the damages due Plaintiff Neil Gaiman. Counsel for Plaintiff are to submit monthly reports on the progress of the accounting. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/11/2010. (arw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GAIMAN, NEIL v. MCFARLANE, TODD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?