Arandell Corporation v. Xcel Energy Inc.
Case Number: 3:2007cv00076
Filed: November 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 292 ORDER granting Motion to Certify Class under Rule 23 (162 in case 3:09-cv-00240-jdp, (275) in case 3:07-cv-00076-jdp) and setting a settlement approval hearing for 6/29/2023 at 1:00 by Zoom. Motion for Final Approval of Settlement Agreement due 6/8/2023. Motion for Attorney Fees due 6/8/2023. Response due 6/15/2023. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/7/2023. Associated Cases: 3:07-cv-00076-jdp, 3:09-cv-00240-jdp (lam)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 290 ORDER that Defendants' motion to stay the case pending resolution of their interlocutory appeal, Dkt. 269 , is GRANTED, except for proceedings related to the settlement with the Williams defendants. Defendants 9; motion for leave to file a reply in support of their motion to stay, Dkt. 274 , is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' motion for a status conference, Dkt. 281 , is DENIED. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/6/2023. Associated Cases: 3:07-cv-00076-jdp, 3:09-cv-00240-jdp (rks)
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 268 ORDER granting Motion for Reconsideration (92 in 3:09-cv-00240-wmc, 205 in 3:07-cv-00076-wmc); granting Motion to Certify Class under Rule 23 (94 in 3:09-cv-00240-wmc, 207 in 3:07-cv-00076-wmc); granting Motion for Leave to File - Defendants' ; Joint Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply in Opposition to Class Certification (113 in 3:09-cv-00240-wmc, 226 in 3:07-cv-00076-wmc); denying as moot Letter to Court Requesting Status Update (149 in 3:09-cv-00240-wmc, 262 in 3:07-cv-00076-wmc); granting Motion Requesting Trial Date (152 in 3:09-cv-00240-wmc, 265 in 3:07-cv-00076-wmc). Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 6/28/2022. Associated Cases: 3:07-cv-00076-wmc, 3:09-cv-00240-wmc (rks)
November 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 267 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Motion to Compel - Defendants' Renewed Joint Motion to Compel Rule 26(a) Disclosures (140 in case no. 3:09-cv-00240-wmc, 253 in case no. 3:07-cv-00076-wmc) ; denying Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of Renewed Joint Motion to Compel Rule 26(a) Disclosures (147 in case no. 3:09-cv-00240-wmc, 260 in case no. 3:07-cv-00076-wmc). Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/2/2021. Associated Cases: 3:07-cv-00076-wmc, 3:09-cv-00240-wmc (rks)
August 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 245 FINAL JUDGMENT of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Cantera Gas Company, LLC, Cantera Resources Management Company, CMS Energy Corporation and CMS Energy Resource Management Company. (WMC/KWF) Associated Cases: 3:07-cv-00076-wmc, 3:09-cv-00240-wmc. (kwf)
August 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 242 ORDER after settlement approval hearing. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 08/07/2020. Associated Cases: 3:07-cv-00076-wmc, 3:09-cv-00240-wmc (mfh)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 192 ORDER Consolidating Cases 07-cv-76-wmc and 09-cv-240-wmc. All future filing should take place in 07-cv-76-wmc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/4/2019. (arw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arandell Corporation v. Xcel Energy Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?