AUSTIN, CLARENCE v. DANE COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH
| Clarence A. Austin |
| Dane County Mental Health |
| 3:2007cv00192 |
| April 13, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Other Civil Rights |
| No cause code entered |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
Order denying Plaintiff's motions to reopen cases 08-cv-00652-bbc; 08-cv-00280-bbc; 09-cv-00244-bbc; 08-cv-00180-bbc; 07-cv-00192-bbc. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 5/6/2010. (eds),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AUSTIN, CLARENCE v. DANE COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Clarence A. Austin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dane County Mental Health | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
