EXTREME NETWORKS, INC. v. ENTERASYS NETWORKS, INC.
Plaintiff: EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.
Defendant: ENTERASYS NETWORKS, INC.
Counter_claimant: ENTERASYS NETWORKS, INC.
Counter_defendant: EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.
Case Number: 3:2007cv00229
Filed: April 20, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Barbara B. Crabb
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 754 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Plaintiff Extreme Networks, Inc. (BBC / PAO). (rep)
August 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 556 Letter re: 555 Notice of Settlement filed by Enterasys Networks, Inc. Telephone Status Conference set for 9/7/2011 at 9:00 AM before Judge Barbara B. Crabb. Counsel for Plaintiff responsible for setting up the call to chambers at (608) 264-5447. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/4/2011. (lak)
March 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 492 AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of EXTREME NETWORKS, INC. against ENTERASYS NETWORKS, INC. in the amount of $48,304.00 in supplemental damages and $15,297.00 in prejudgment interest. (BBC/PAO) (arw)
March 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 490 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 438 Defendant's Motion to Modify Permanent Injunction; granting 440 Motion to Stay Injunction pending appeal; denying 446 Plaintiff's Motion to Modify the Injunction; denying 448 Motion to Strike; denying 451 Motion for New Trial and request for hearing; granting in part and denying in part 460 Motion for supplemental damages. Plaintiff is awarded $48,304 in supplemental damages; $15,297 in prejudgment interest; and post-judgment interest at a rate of $10.38/day. Amended judgment to be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B Crabb on 3/16/2009. (llj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EXTREME NETWORKS, INC. v. ENTERASYS NETWORKS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.
Represented By: John George Bisbikis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ENTERASYS NETWORKS, INC.
Represented By: A. James Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: ENTERASYS NETWORKS, INC.
Represented By: Marla R. Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: EXTREME NETWORKS, INC.
Represented By: John George Bisbikis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?