Sallis v. Bartels et al
Dexter Sallis |
Mary Bartels, Burton Cox, Mandy Mathson and John Paquin |
3:2008cv00514 |
September 8, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Dane |
Stephen L Crocker |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 Order denying plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 1/13/10. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 61 ORDER denying 60 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss notice of appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/7/09. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 59 Order Construing Notice of Appeal as Request to Proceed ifp. Trust Fund Account Statement due by 10/9/2009.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/18/09. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 54 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants Mary Bartels, Burton Cox, Mandy Mathson and John Paquin dismissing the case. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 8/25/09. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 53 ORDER granting 25 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants ; denying 31 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 8/24/09. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 5 Order on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 13.63 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due by 9/25/2008. Signed by Judge Stephen L Crocker on 9/5/08. (krj),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.