Sallis v. Bartels et al
Plaintiff: Dexter Sallis
Defendant: Mary Bartels, Burton Cox, Mandy Mathson and John Paquin
Case Number: 3:2008cv00514
Filed: September 8, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Dane
Presiding Judge: Stephen L Crocker
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 Order denying plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 1/13/10. (elc),(ps)
October 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER denying 60 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss notice of appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/7/09. (elc),(ps)
September 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 59 Order Construing Notice of Appeal as Request to Proceed ifp. Trust Fund Account Statement due by 10/9/2009.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/18/09. (elc),(ps)
August 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 54 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants Mary Bartels, Burton Cox, Mandy Mathson and John Paquin dismissing the case. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 8/25/09. (elc),(ps)
August 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER granting 25 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants ; denying 31 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 8/24/09. (elc),(ps)
September 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 13.63 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due by 9/25/2008. Signed by Judge Stephen L Crocker on 9/5/08. (krj),(ps)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sallis v. Bartels et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dexter Sallis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Bartels
Represented By: Corey F. Finkelmeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burton Cox
Represented By: Corey F. Finkelmeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mandy Mathson
Represented By: Corey F. Finkelmeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Paquin
Represented By: Corey F. Finkelmeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?