Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin v. KEMPTHORNE et al
| Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin |
| DIRK KEMPTHORNE, GEORGE T. SKIBINE, KEVIN SKENANDORE and LYNN LAFFERTY |
| 3:2008cv00659 |
| November 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Sawyer |
| Barbara B Crabb |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| No cause code entered |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER denying 18 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice. Plaintiff may renew the motion on or before 10/6/09. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/14/09. (rep)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER denying 47 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Plaintiff Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin re 44 Order on Motion to Continue filed by Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/7/09. (rep)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 14 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants must answer the complaint within 10 days of this order. The stay imposed in the March 13 order is lifted. Defendants have until 5/15/09 to respond to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has until 5/27/09 to reply. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 4/23/09. (rep)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
