Allen v. Department of Corrections et al
Matthew Allen |
Department of Corrections, Rick Raemish and Matt Haneman |
3:2008cv00665 |
November 14, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Jackson |
Barbara B. Crabb |
Stephen L. Crocker |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants dismissing the case. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 2/9/10. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 27 Order Directing Case be Closed. Plaintiff is to be assessed a strike under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 2/5/2010. (lak),(ps) |
Filing 18 Order dismissing complaint for violation of Rule 8. Plaintiff to submit proposed amended complaint that complies with Rule 8 by 11/23/2009 or case to be closed and a strike assessed for plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/5/09. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 9 JUDGMENT in favor of Department of Corrections, Matt Haneman, Rick Raemish against Matthew Allen. (PAO / MFH) Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B Crabb on 1/7/09. (krj),(ps) |
Filing 4 Order on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 5.30 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due by 12/9/2008. Signed by Judge Barbara B Crabb on 1/18/08. (krj),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.