Fitzpatrick v. Madison Area Technical College et al
| Maurice Fitzpatrick |
| Madison Area Technical College, Madison Area Technical College District, Madison Area Technical College District Board, Janice K. Bultema, Jon R. Bales, Carolyn S. Stoner, Carousel Andrea Bayrd, James A. Cavanaugh, Frances Huntley-Cooper, Vera M. Riley, Josephine Oyama-Miller, Joel Winn, Madison Area Technical College President, Bettsey L. Barhorst, Keith Cornille and Brenda Thomas |
| 3:2008cv00710 |
| December 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Dane |
| Stephen L Crocker |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendant Keith Cornille dismissing the case with prejudice. (PAO/JT) (eds),(ps)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 24 Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss ; denying as moot 9 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/22/2009. (eds),(ps)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 18 MOTION to receive electronic filing notices and for extension of summary judgment deadline. Plaintiff's brief in opposition due 10/19/09; defendant's reply due by 10/29/09. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/18/09. (elc),(ps) Modified on 11/9/2009 (llj).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
