Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
| Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., S-LCD Corporation, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC |
| 3:2009cv00001 |
| January 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Patent Office |
| Dane |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 35:145 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
424
Order ruling in part on cross motions for partial summary judgment 201 and 202 . Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 5/7/2010. (llj)
|
|
Filing
170
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants allowed until 1/15/2010 to file amended pleading in accordance with the order. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 1/5/2010. (llj)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER denying 97 Motion Requesting Claims Construction ; denying 99 Motion Requesting Claims Construction. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/4/2009. (llj)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting 62 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Company, Ltd. has until September 14, 2009 within which to respondto the discovery request. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/12/09. (vob)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 14 Motion to Transfer. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 6/8/2009. (llj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
