National Pork Producers Council et al v. Jackson
Plaintiff: National Pork Producers Council and Wisconsin Pork Association
Defendant: Lisa P Jackson
Case Number: 3:2009cv00073
Filed: February 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Environmental Matters Office
County: Grant
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER granting 49 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 53 Motion to Lift Stay. Because the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit may resolve all of the remaining issues between the parties and make any further proc eedings in this court unnecessary, the clerk of court is directed to close the case administratively. In the event the court of appeals does not resolve all of the issues, the case will be reopened immediately upon motion of any party, with the parties retaining all rights they would have had if the case had not been closed for administrative purposes. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/23/09. (vob)
May 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER that a decision on the motion to dismiss 49 filed by defendant Lisa Jackson, is stayed pending resolution of plaintiff National Porker Producer Council's motion regarding jurisdiction before the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in cases nos. 09-1017 and 09-1104. If the court of appeals has not resolved the motion by 7/31/09, the council is to submit to this court an update on the status of the cases. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 5/22/09. (vob)
May 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER denying 38 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 13 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Plaintiff may have until 5/5/09 to file a renewed motion to dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 5/1/09. (rep)
April 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER setting briefing schedule re 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Lisa P. Jackson. Brief in Support due by 4/20/09; Brief in Opposition by 4/30/09; Brief in Reply due by 5/5/09. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 4/14/09. (vob)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: National Pork Producers Council et al v. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: National Pork Producers Council
Represented By: Ronald R. Ragatz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wisconsin Pork Association
Represented By: Ronald R. Ragatz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lisa P Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?