Mueller v. Bank One, N.A. et al
| Linda Mueller |
| Bank One, N.A. and William A. Chatterton, Trustee |
| 3:2009cv00137 |
| March 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) Office |
| Dane |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER affirming Bankruptcy Court decision RE: 1 Bankruptcy Appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 12/29/09. (elc),(ps)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER reopening case. Appellees have until 11/9/09 to file their brief in opposition; appellant has until 11/16/09 to file her reply. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/26/09. (elc),(ps)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER dismissing 1 Bankruptcy Appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/23/2009. (eds),(ps)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying 17 Motion to Dismiss. Briefing set on bankruptcy appeal. Appellee Linda Muellers failure to file a brief in support of her appeal by 10/21/09 will result is dismissal of her appeal. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/5/09. (elc),(ps)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER that Appellant Linda Mueller has until 9/4/09 to respond to the motion to dismiss. Appellee reply to motion to dismiss due 9/14/09. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 8/27/09. (elc),(ps) Modified on 8/27/2009 (elc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
