Briggs-Muhammad v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc, Store 2335 et al
Miriam Briggs-Muhammad |
Wal-Mart Associates Inc, Store 2335, Peggy Wilson, Dan Astle, Tim Utler, Jason Winckler and John and Jane Does 1 thru 5 |
3:2009cv00193 |
April 2, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Dane |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 ORDER denying 85 Motion for preparation of transcript of November 5, 2012 hearing. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 10/29/2013. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 70 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL. (voc) |
Filing 45 ORDER that Michael F. Brown is appointed to represent plaintiff in this case. All proceedings in this case remain STAYED pending a status conference, at which time a new schedule will be set for moving this case to resolution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 4/7/2011. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 43 ORDER that attorney Michael F. Brown may have until April 5, 2011 to inform the court whether he will be representing plaintiff in this matter. Plaintiff should expect to hear from Brown in the near future. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 3/17/2011. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting 4 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff has until 7/9/09 to complete and return marshal service and summons forms. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 6/25/09. (eds),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.