Clay v. JT Packard & Associates, Inc. et al
Marcus Clay |
JT Packard & Associates, Inc. and S.R. Bray Corporation d/b/a Power Plus! |
3:2009cv00313 |
May 18, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Dane |
Barbara B. Crabb |
Stephen L. Crocker |
None |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 Order re 39 Motion to Substitute Party filed by Marcus Clay. Plaintiff may have until 9/22/2010 to file reply brief on the motion to substitute a party. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/15/2010. (llj) |
Filing 38 Order: A telephone status conference was held in this case on August 6, 2010 before United States District Judge Barbara B. Crabb. Plaintiffs Brian Teed and Marcus Clay appeared by Larry Johnson. There were no appearances for defendant, which is no l onger in business, having sold its assets. Before these cases can proceed, it will be necessary to determine whether the asset purchaser has any potential liability for wrongful acts committed by defendant. Mr. Johnson believes that it does and inte nds to serve the new entity in this case under Fed. R. Civ. P.25(c) (substitution of transferee party for original). He may have until August 19, 2010, in which to accomplish service under that theory. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/9/2010. (vob) |
Filing 32 ORDER denying 28 Motion for Leave to File surreply and denying 22 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 2/2/2010. (vob) Modified on 2/9/2010 (llj/t). |
Filing 21 ORDER Counsel for defendants JT Packard and Associates, Inc., and S.R. Bray Corporation, have advised the court that J.T. Packard & Associates, Inc., has filed for receivership in state court. Defendants ask the court to either stay all proceedings i n this case until the state court proceedings are complete or to dismiss the case without prejudice, allowing the parties claims to be resolved in state court. I am prepared to dismiss the proceedings without prejudice unless plaintiffs object to my doing so and have a persuasive reason why the case should not be dismissed. Plaintiffs may have until January 4, 2010 to object. Signed by Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 12/17/09. (vob) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.