PrivaCash, Inc. v. American Express Company et al
| PrivaCash, Inc. |
| American Express Company, American Express Incentive Services, L.L.C. and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. |
| 3:2009cv00391 |
| June 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| Visiting Judge |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Plaintiff |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendant American Express Company granting its motion for summary judgment and dismissing the remaining counterclaims. (PAO) Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 10/6/2010. (llj)
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 63 Motion for Summary Judgment by defendants; denying 68 Motion for Summary Judgment by plaintiff; judgment to be entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/4/2010. (llj)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER Construing Claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 3/26/10. (rep)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying defendants' request for a claims construction hearing; identifying terms for construction by the court; denying defendants' request to file a reply brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 12/15/2009. (llj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
