Strader v. Reed et al
| Eugene Strader, Sr. |
| James Reed, Judy Spahn, Chris Russell, Gregg Fearday, Trate and Padilla |
| 3:2010cv00055 |
| February 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Adams |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants Fearday, Padilla, Trate and the United States of America dismissing this case. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER that plaintiff notify this court by May 31, 2011 if he wishes to voluntarily dismiss this case with prejudice or, in the alternative, submit his brief in opposition to defendants' 26 motion for summary judgment. If plaintiff files a brief in opposition, defendants may file a reply not later than June 13, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/19/2011. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
14
Order dismissing plaintiff's FTCA claim; denying as moot 10 motion to dismiss complaint by defendant. Proposed amended complaint due 6/18/2010. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 6/1/2010. (eds),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
Order on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $36.41 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 3/5/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/9/10. (elc),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
