Naseer, Hakim v. Neumaier, Brian et al
| Hakim Naseer |
| Brian Neumaier, Thomas Schoeneberg and Morrison |
| 3:2010cv00399 |
| July 16, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants Brian Neumaier, Thomas Schoeneberg and Morrison dismissing this case for plaintiff's failure to satisfy Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. ( PAO) Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 9/30/2010. (jef),(ps)
|
Filing
8
ORDER Dismissing 1 Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and denying plaintiff's 7 request for leave to file an amended complaint that includes a new claim involving new defendants. Strike recorded pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The clerk is directed to enter judgment for defendants and close this case. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 09/29/2010. (jef),(ps)
|
Filing
6
Order Dismissing 1 Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Proposed amended complaint due 9/28/2010. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/13/10. (elc),(ps)
|
Filing
5
Order on ifp request: $.40 initial partial filing fee due 8/24/2010. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/27/2010. (eds),(ps)
|
Filing
3
Order on ifp request: Trust Fund Account Statement due 8/6/2010. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/19/2010. (eds),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.