Wisconsin Club for Growth, Inc. et al. v. Gordon Myse et al.
| Wisconsin Club for Growth, Inc., Eric O'Keefe, One Wisconsin Now, Inc. and Scot Ross |
| Gordon Myse, Thomas Barland, Michael Brennan, Thomas Cane, Gerald Nichol, David G. Deininger and Kevin Kennedy |
| 3:2010cv00427 |
| July 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER administratively closing case subject to reopening for good cause shown. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/28/2013. (arw)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 22 Stipulation and Proposed Order re: Motion for Preliminary Injunction, denying without prejudice 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Further proceedings stayed until Wisconsin Supreme Court determines whether to accept petition for original action. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 10/12/2010. (arw)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER directing Plaintiffs to file proof of service of complaint and motion for preliminary injunction by 4:30 PM on 8/4/2010. Defendants' response re: 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction due by 4:30 PM on 8/10/2010. Telephonic Status Conference set for 8/11/2010 at 1:30 PM. Motion Hearing set for 8/12/2010 at 8:30 AM. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/3/2010. (arw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
