Patel, Arvind v. U.S. Department of State et al
| Arvind M. Patel |
| U.S. Department of State, Josiah L. Keats and 2nd Federal Agent (DOS) |
| 3:2011cv00006 |
| January 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Juneau |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case with prejudice for plaintiff's repeated failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER granting 47 , 53 , 57 , 61 Motions to Dismiss, denying 59 Motion to Strike. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice for plaintiff's repeated failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/2/2013. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER that all remaining deadlines in the 41 amended scheduling order are STAYED until further notice. The court will enter a new scheduling order once the pending motions have been resolved. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/14/2013. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
2
Initial Order for Paid Pro Se: Plaintiff directed to serve complaint. Proof of service due 3/7/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 1/10/2011. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
