Amos, Albert v. Dittmann, Michael
Petitioner: Albert James Amos
Respondent: Michael A. Dittmann
Case Number: 3:2011cv00354
Filed: May 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Waushara
Presiding Judge: William M. Conley
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case with prejudice. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
May 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying petitioner's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. $5 filing fee due 6/15/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/25/2011. (jef),(ps)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amos, Albert v. Dittmann, Michael
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael A. Dittmann
Represented By: Gregory M. Weber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Albert James Amos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?