Begolli, Bahri v. Home Depot et al
Plaintiff: Bahri Begolli
Defendant: Home Depot and Matt Spencer
Case Number: 3:2011cv00380
Filed: May 27, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Dane
Presiding Judge: Barbara B. Crabb
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 142 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendant Home Depot Inc. dismissing the case. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDER that defendant The Home Depot may have until February 3, 2014 in which to file the November 14, 2013 deposition transcript. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 1/28/2014. (jef),(ps)
November 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER denying 123 motion to compel production of documents. Plaintiff is to make arrangements to meet with defendant's counsel on or before December 11, 2013. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/25/2013. (jef),(ps)
October 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER that plaintiff Bahri Begolli's motion to quash non-party subpoenas,dkt. # 113 , is DENIED. A ruling is stayed on defendant The Home Depot's motions for sanctions, dkt. # 94 , and supplemental motion for sanctions, dkt. # 107 . Defenda nt's motion to expedite the motion to amend the current scheduling order, to require plaintiff to appear for additional time to complete his deposition and to appoint a special master to insure that plaintiff complies with his discovery obligati ons, dkt. # 99 , is GRANTED as it relates to requiring plaintiff to appear for a continued deposition at the Robert W. Kastenmeier Courthouse at a date and time to be set by defendant in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30, but no later than November 15, 2013; defendant may accompany the deposition notice with a Rule 34 request to plaintiff to produce documents and tangible things at the deposition; it is GRANTED also as to the amendment of the current scheduling order; a new scheduling conference will be held before the United States Magistrate Judge if the case goes forward; and it is DENIED as to the request for the appointment of a special master. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/23/2013. (jef),(ps)
September 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER denying plaintiff's 71 motion to quash. TDS Telecom is hereby ordered to comply with the subpoena to produce records for ( 608) 829-3188 attached as Exhibit A; and U.S. Cellular Corporation is hereby ordered to comply with the subpoena to produce records for (608) 712-4633 attached as Exhibit B. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/5/2013. (jef),(ps)
August 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 Order DENYING plaintiff's 71 Motion to Quash ; GRANTING with small exceptions defendant's 76 Motion to Compel ; DENYING defendant's request to shift costs; GRANTING IN PART defendant's 84 Motion to amend the schedule. Summ ary judgment motions are due October 18, 2013. Defendant's deadline to disclose expert witnesses is extended to November 15, 2013. The trial date of March 17, 2014 remains in place. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 8/30/2013. (elc),(ps)
April 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal on the condition that, no later than May 17, 2012, he submit a check or money order made payable to the clerk of court in the amount of $227.50. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 4/27/2012. (jef),(ps)
March 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
March 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER that this case is dismissed for plaintiff Bahri Begolli's failure to file a timely complaint of discrimination, as required by 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1). Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/12/2012. (jef),(ps)
July 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Dismissing 1 Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Amended complaint due 7/28/2011. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/7/2011. (jef),(ps)
May 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 175.00 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 6/22/2011. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 5/31/2011. (jef),(ps)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Begolli, Bahri v. Home Depot et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Home Depot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matt Spencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bahri Begolli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?