Konitzer, Scott v. Hamblin, Gary et al
| Scott A. Konitzer |
| Gary Hamblin, Janel Nickel, Janet Mink, Keller, Tina Martin and Randy Becker |
| 3:2011cv00426 |
| June 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
254
ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' 155 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying 249 Motion that Defendant Tina Martin Not Be Permitted Discretionary Immunity ;granting plaintiff's 188 request for recruitment of coun sel. Further proceedings remain stayed pending recruitment of counsel for plaintiff. Once the court finds counsel willing to represent plaintiff, the court will advise the parties and hold a status and scheduling conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/27/2013. (elc),(ps)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER denying plaintiff's 105 motion to certify an interlocutory appeal. The clerk of court is directed to insure that plaintiff's obligation to pay the $455 fee for filing this appeal is reflected in the court's financial records. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 7/12/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 44.85 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 7/7/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 6/17/2011. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
