Halford, Ernest v. Walker, Scott et al
| Ernest Halford |
| Scott Walker, J. Beahm, Gary Hamblin, Dan Stiemsma, Todd Nehls, Steven Bauer, Bill Pollard, James Doyle and Rick Raemisch |
| 3:2011cv00456 |
| June 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dodge |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
JUDGMENT dismissing this case without prejudice for plaintiff Ernest Louis Halford's failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER dismissing 26 , 27 Proposed Amended Complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8., denying 18 , 21 , 29 Motions to Appoint Counsel without prejudice. Amended Complaint due 9/20/2012. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/23/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER dismissing 1 complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Amended complaint due 3/7/2012. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/7/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 36.32 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 8/16/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 7/26/2011. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit Trust fund account statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 7/21/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 6/30/2011. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
