De Jesus, Allan et al v. De Jesus, Michael et al
| Allan De Jesus, Amanda De Jesus Lauritzen and A.D. |
| Michael De Jesus, Melissa De Jesus, Deborah Lavenduskey and The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| Allan De Jesus, Amanda De Jesus Lauritzen and A.D. |
| Michael De Jesus, Melissa De Jesus and Deborah Lavenduskey |
| The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| 3:2011cv00579 |
| August 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| La Crosse |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants Melissa De Jesus, Michael De Jesus, Deborah Lavenduskey dismissing the case. ( LAK). (rep)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER that defendants have until 3/29/2012 to serve and file supplemental materials showing the court may exercise jurisdiction over this case. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/22/12. (rep)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER that by November 15, 2011, defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America is to send a check in the amount of $100,026 made payable to the Clerk of District Court, Western District of Wisconsin. The clerk is instructed to deposit the funds and hold them in a non-interest bearing account until further order of the court. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/18/2011. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
