West, Rufus v. Grams, Gregory
| Rufus West |
| Gregory Grams, Mike Meisner, Mardel Petras, Rick Raemisch, Gary Hamblin, Campbell, Mark Teslik, John Doe, John Does and William Grosshans |
| 3:2011cv00687 |
| October 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
131
ORDER that the clerk of court is directed to set a telephone conference to set the schedule for the remainder of the proceedings in this lawsuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/26/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER that plaintiff Mansa Lutalo Iyapo's 111 motion to alter or amend the June 16, 2014 judgment is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 11/03/2014. (nln),(ps) Modified docket text on 11/4/2014 (nln).
|
|
Filing
110
AMENDED JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants granting in part their motion for summary judgment, except as to plaintiff's Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act claims for injunctive relief, which are dismissed as moot. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
103
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
38
JUDGMENT entered denying plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
