Coil, Bobby v. Boisen et al
| Bobby Lee Coil |
| Brown, Boisen, Kussmaul, Moris, Riley, Stacey Hoem, Jonni S. Sharpe, Dane Esser, J. Sweeney, Tim Haines, Shana L. Becker, Anderson, Brinkman, John Does (1-5) Defendants and Stewart |
| 3:2012cv00069 |
| February 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER that defendants may have until May 13, 2014, in which to advise plaintiff Coil and the court whether they agree to Coil's request for dismissal of this action without prejudice. If defendants do not agree to such a dismissal, Coil may have until May 23, 2014 in which to either (1) withdraw his motion to dismiss or (2) advise the court that he has no objection to a dismissal of this case with prejudice. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 5/5/2014. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/13/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit Trust fund account statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 2/22/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/1/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
