Kaufman, James v. Hamblin, Gary et al
| James J. Kaufman |
| Gary H. Hamblin, Kathryn Anderson, Katherine Nagle, David White, Eileen Cleaver, Robert De Young, Danielle La Cost and Amy Gleisner |
| 3:2012cv00087 |
| February 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Chippewa |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
JUDGMENT entered denying plaintiff leave to proceed and dismissing this case. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER denying plaintiff leave to proceed on his claims that his due process rights were violated when he was denied parole and blocked from transfer to minimum security status. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED regarding the remainder of his claims for violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Plaintiff may have until July 20, 2012, to submit a proposed amended complaint. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/2/1012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 8.48 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 3/20/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/27/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit Trust fund account statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 3/5/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 2/13/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
