Mikulance, Thomas et al v. Raemisch, Rick et al
| Thomas A. Mikulance, Robert Lemke, Michael Ebbott and and one or more John Does |
| Rick Raemisch, Randall R. Hepp, Kathryn Anderson, Deborah Rychlowski, Carol Briones, Terri Marco, Jodi Dougherty and and one or more John Does |
| 3:2012cv00158 |
| March 6, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants denying plaintiff leave to proceed and dismissing this case with prejudice. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $18.49 assessed as to Thomas Mikulance. Initial partial filing fee due 5/14/2012. Plaintiffs Michael Ebbott and Thomas Lemke are considered to have opted out of this lawsuit and are DISMISSED from the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 4/23/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiffs given opportunity to opt out of group lawsuit. Plaintiffs to opt out by 4/10/2012. Lemke and Ebbott's signed complaints due 4/10/2012. Trust fund account statements due 4/10/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 3/20/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
