Hunts Point Ventures, Inc. v. Research in Motion Limited et al
| Hunts Point Ventures, Inc. |
| Research in Motion Limited and Research in Motion Corporation |
| 3:2012cv00307 |
| April 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Out of State |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Research in Motion Limited, Research in Motion Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Summons Research in Motion Corporation) (arw) |
| Standard attachments for Judge William M. Conley required to be served on all parties with summons or waiver of service: NORTC, Briefing Guidelines, Corporate Disclosure Statement. (arw) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley and Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker. (arw) |
| Filing 1 PATENT COMPLAINT against Research in Motion Corporation, Research in Motion Limited (Filing Fee $350, receipt number 0758-977642) filed by Hunts Point Ventures, Inc. PATENTS AT ISSUE: Patent # 7,667,123, issued 02/23/10, held by Hunts Point Ventures, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 7,667,123, # 2 JS-44 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Report on Filing Patent/Trademark Action, # 4 Summons Research In Motion Limited, # 5 Summons Research In Motion Corporation) (Linke, Derek) Modified on 5/4/2012. (arw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
