Wagner, Jody v. Suliene, Dalia et al
| Jody Michael Wagner |
| Dalia Suliene and Department of Corrections of Wisconsin |
| 3:2012cv00376 |
| May 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Portage |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying plaintiff leave to proceed on his claims against Department of Corrections and the complaint is dismissed as to the department. Plaintiff is denied leave to proceed on his claim that defendant Dalia Suliene violated his rights under th e Eight Amendment by not recommending or approving his hip surgery. Plaintiff's claim that defendant Suliene violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment by not treating his pain adequately is DISMISSED without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P . 8. Plaintiff may have until November 8, 2012 to file an amended complaint that identifies what treatment, if any, defendant Suliene provided or withheld. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint in that time, the court will dismiss the case. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/18/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 13.78 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 6/22/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 6/1/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
