O'Grady, Michael v. Carlson, Tersa et al
| Michael O'Grady |
| Teresa L. Carlson and James L. Santelle |
| 3:2012cv00388 |
| May 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Columbia |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants Teresa L. Carlson, James L. Santelle dismissing this case as frivolous. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER that the November 16, 2012, order dismissing this case as frivolousis AMENDED so that it is limited to plaintiff Michael O'Grady's claims against defendants Teresa Carlson and James Santelle. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in favor of those two defendants and close this case. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER dismissing this case as frivolous. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants and close this case. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/16/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER that defendants Teresa L. Carlson and James L. Santelle may have until October 17, 2012, to show cause why this case should not be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/10/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
