Buchanan, Terrence v. Weaver, Jonathan et al
| Terrence Buchanan |
| Jonathan Weaver and John Does 1-4 |
| 3:2012cv00408 |
| June 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Brown |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER denying 44 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 12/16/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
32
JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for want of prosecution. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER that plaintiff Terrence Buchanan has until April 7, 2014 to file a letter with this court showing cause as to why this lawsuit should not be dismissed for a failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/31/2014. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying plaintiff Terrence Buchanan's request for leave to take an interlocutory appeal. The court CERTIFIES that Buchanan's appeal is not taken in good faith for purposes of Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3) and DENIES his motion leave to proceed in forma pauperis (dkt. # 12 ) in this case. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/4/2014. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 4.83 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 7/3/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 6/11/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
