Key, DaJuan v. Meisner, Michael et al
| DaJuan A. Key |
| John Doe 2, Millonig, Melissa RN, Janel Nickels, Tony Ashworth, Timothy Ziegler, Higbee, Morgan, Travis Bittleman, Brian Neumaier, Karen Anderson, Dalia Suliene, Ms. Postler, Michael Meisner, Tim Douma, John Doe 1, Joe Reda and Cichonanowicz |
| 3:2012cv00422 |
| June 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Portage |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
JUDGMENT is entered dismissing this case without prejudice for want of prosecution. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER the complaint filed by plaintiff DaJuan A. Key is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. Plaintiff is advised that relief from this order may be granted upon a showing of good cause. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 9/24/2013. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 11.97 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 7/16/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 6/25/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit Trust fund account statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 7/9/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 6/14/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
