Rivera, Natanael v. Dinse et al
| Natanael Rivera |
| John or Jane Does 1-20, Dinse, Michael Baenen, Amy Basten, Legois, Cathy Francois, Charles Cole, Welcome Rose and Cathy Jess |
| 3:2012cv00509 |
| July 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Brown |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case for plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER dismissing plaintiff's 1 complaint for his failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's 2 motion for a preliminary injunction is denied as moot. A strike will be recorded in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants and close this case. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 9/26/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 5.12 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 8/20/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 8/3/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER that plaintiff may have until August 10, 2012, in which to submit a supplemental trust fund account statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 7/19/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
