Smith, Derrick v. Gleason, Deb et al
| Derrick L. Smith |
| Deb Gleason and Other Supervisors and Jail Staff |
| 3:2012cv00633 |
| August 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Marathon |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
JUDGMENT entered denying plaintiff Derrick L. Smith's request for leave to proceed and dismissing the complaint with prejudice as legally frivolous and malicious. ( PAO/elc),(ps)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER denying plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction. Plaintiff is warned that he will face additional sanctions, including monetary penalties, if he continues to abuse scarce judicial resources with repetitive filings. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 11/26/2013. (elc),(ps)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying plaintiff leave to proceed and dismissing his 1 complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and 20. Amended Complaint due 12/10/2013. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 11/25/2013. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. Initial partial filing fee of $ 2.40 assessed. ( Initial partial filing fee due 9/9/2013.) Plaintiff's motion to stay or temporarily suspend is DENIED. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/12/2013. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
19
Order DENYING plaintiff's motion to temporarily suspend cases 12-cv-633, 741, 742, 743, 952, 953 and 954. If plaintiff intends to pursue any of his closed cases, he must submit a new certified inmate trust fund account statement that comports wi th 28 U.S.C. §1915(b) and the written statement indicating which, if any, of the above-referenced cases he wishes to pursue. No further extensions will be granted. If plaintiff fails to comply as directed within ten days, then his closed cases will be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 6/4/2013. (elc),(ps)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER that plaintiff Derrick Smith's motion to waive the PLRA filing fee requirement is DENIED. Smith's motion to temporarily suspend or stay 12-cv-633, 741, 742, 743, 953 and 954 is GRANTED. The Clerk's Office will ADMINISTRATIVELY C LOSE these cases for 60 days. To re-open any of his closed cases (12-cv-633, 741, 742, 743, 953 and 954), Smith must notify the court in writing within 60 days. Smith must also comply with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (the PLRA), which requires inmates to pay by installment the full amount of the filing fee, by including a new certified inmate trust fund account statement that comports with 28 U.S.C. §1915(b). Smith is advised that, if the court hears nothing from him within 60 days, then 12-cv-633, 741, 742, 743, 953 and 954 may be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/30/2013. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER on ifp request: Initial partial filing fee of $ 20.18 assessed. Initial partial filing fee due 10/9/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/17/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit Trust fund account statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 9/20/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 8/29/2012. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
