Elkinton, Cheryl v. President of the United States et al
Cheryl A. Elkinton |
Veterans Affairs, U.S. Military, U.S. Dept. of Defense, Military Marketing Assoc. and President of the United States |
3:2012cv00681 |
September 19, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Dane |
William M. Conley |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER that Cheryl Elkinton's September 5, 2013, letter to the court if construed as a motion for reconsideration (No. 12-cv-681 dkt. # 13 ; No. 12-cv-694 dkt. #13; No. 12-cv-717 dkt. # 13 ; No. 12-cv-769 dkt. # 13 ; No. 13-cv-166 dkt. # 6 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 10/7/2013. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 10 ORDER Construing Notice of Appeal as Request to Proceed ifp. Leave to proceed ifp denied. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 12/18/2012. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (PAO). (jef),(ps) |
Filing 5 ORDER dismissing this case with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's 4 motion to consolidate cases is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 11/5/2012. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 3 ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 9/21/2012. (jef),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.