United States of America v. 2005 Jeep Cherokee Limited
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 2005 Jeep Cherokee Limited
Case Number: 3:2012cv00720
Filed: October 4, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Rock
Presiding Judge: William M. Conley
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 21 U.S.C. ยง 0881 Forfeiture Property - Automobile
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Plaintiff United States of America dismissing the case. (rep)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. 2005 Jeep Cherokee Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Elizabeth Altman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 2005 Jeep Cherokee Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?