Green, Steven v. Chvala, Steven et al
| Steven A Green |
| Steven T Chvala, Justin L Garcis, Brooke A Lomas and Bradley D Schorder |
| 3:2012cv00761 |
| October 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Out of State |
| William M. Conley |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendant Bradley Schroeder dismissing the case. (WMC /PAO) (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER denying defendant's first motion in limine as moot. Defendant may file, by noon on Thursday, September 8, 2016, a proposed damages instruction for injury or harm. Plaintiff may file, by the end of the day on Thursday, September 8, 2016, hearsay objections to specific statements made in either of the 911 audio tapes. The court will hold a hearing at 10:00 a.m. on Friday, September 9, 2016, for defendant to make a proffer regarding the software Michael Doeden intends to use at trial. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 9/6/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
163
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 121 plaintiff's First Motion in Limine ; granting 122 plaintiff's second Motion in Limine ; reserving 98 defendant's First Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 126 defendant's Second Motion in Limine ; and denying 148 defendant's Third Motion in Limine Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 09/05/2016. (mfh),(ps)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER that the clerk's office enter James Burrows of the law firm of Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren as plaintiff's pro bono counsel of record and to set this case for a scheduling conference in later November 2015, as the court's schedule allows. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 11/4/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER denying 45 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 50 and 54 Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment ; granting 76 Motion to Supplement; granting 80 Motion for Assistance in Recruiting Counsel ; and denying as moot 85 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 10/09/15. (mfh),(ps)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER that the request by plaintiff Steven A. Green for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED at this time. For his appeal to proceed, Green must file a properly supported motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the appella te filing fee in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), together with a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the preceding six months, within twenty (20) days of the date of this order. Green is advised that if he does not comply as directed, the clerk of court will alert the Seventh Circuit, which may result in the dismissal of his appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 12/11/2013. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
10
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants denying plaintiff leave to proceed and dismissing this case with prejudice plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 10/15/12 granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Further ordering the Clerk of Court to transmit the file to the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. (cc: via USPS to plaintiff) (dm) [Transferred from Wisconsin Eastern on 10/17/2012.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
