Walters, Amy v. Mayo Clinic Health Systems
Amy J. Walters |
Mayo Clinic Health System - Eau Claire Hospital, Inc. |
3:2012cv00804 |
November 6, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Dane |
William M. Conley |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 301 ORDER granting 300 Motion to Seal Opinion and Order. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/10/15. (jls) |
Filing 295 ORDER granting 292 Supplemental Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/17/15. (jat) |
Filing 290 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 233 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 240 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment; denying 257 Motion to Compel; denying 261 Motion to Set Aside; granting in part and denying in part 286 Motion for Leave to File. Plaintiff awarded attorney fees in the amount of $393,514.72. Costs Taxed in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $ 19,184.68. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/4/15. (jat) |
Filing 232 AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Amy J. Walters against Mayo Clinic Health System - Eau Claire Hospital, Inc. in the amount of $ 543,841.20. (WMC / PAO). (krj) |
Filing 229 JUDGMENT in favor of Amy J. Walters against Mayo Clinic Health System - Eau Claire Hospital, Inc. in the amount of $ 531,126.20. (WMC / PAO). (krj) |
Filing 206 ORDER that court will instruct jury on definition of "substantially limits" consistent with ADAAA and current version of 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j), except to exclude "most people in the general population" if either party objects. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/25/14. (krj) |
Filing 197 ORDER on deposition designations. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/20/14. (krj) |
Filing 151 ORDER granting in part, denying in part, and reserving in part 115 Motions in Limine by plaintiff; granting in part, denying in part, and reserving in part 121 Motions in Limine by defendant. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/14/14. (krj) |
Filing 104 ORDER denying 36 Motion for Summary Judgment. Final pretrial conference set for 3/13/14 at 3:00 PM. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/10/14. (krj) |
Filing 102 ORDER granting 87 Motion to Supplementexpert disclosures. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/23/14. (krj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Walters, Amy v. Mayo Clinic Health Systems | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Amy J. Walters | |
Represented By: | Carol N. Skinner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mayo Clinic Health System - Eau Claire Hospital, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Michael J. Modl |
Represented By: | Michael J. Westcott |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.