American Eagle Superstore, Inc. v. Snap Fireworks, Inc.

Defendant: Snap Fireworks, Inc.
Plaintiff: American Eagle Superstore, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv00951
Filed: December 27, 2012
Court: Wisconsin Western District Court
Office: Madison Office
County: Vernon
Presiding Judge: William M. Conley
Referring Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 8, 2014 15 Opinion or Order of the Court CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of American Eagle Superstore, Inc. against Snap Fireworks, Inc. in the amount of $ 256,270.56. (WMC / PAO). Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 5/8/2014. (voc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: American Eagle Superstore, Inc. v. Snap Fireworks, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Snap Fireworks, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph J. Connell, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: American Eagle Superstore, Inc.
Represented By: Pamela M. Schmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.