Carroll, David v. Team PDS, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David T. Carroll
Defendant:
Team PDS, Inc.
Case Number:
3:2013cv00153
Filed:
March 1, 2013
Court:
Wisconsin Western District Court
Office:
Madison Office
County:
Dane
Presiding Judge:
Barbara B. Crabb
Referring Judge:
Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit:
Contract: Other
Cause of Action:
28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By:
Both
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
May 29, 2013 | 8 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carroll, David v. Team PDS, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Team PDS, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Laurie E. Meyer |
Represented By: | Frederick J. Strampe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David T. Carroll | |
Represented By: | R. George Burnettt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.