Grant, James v. Schaefer, Trenton et al
James Edward Grant |
Trenton Schaefer, Craig Vandermolen, Greg Shondrell, Tuescher, Mark Twombly and Gerald Hundt |
3:2013cv00374 |
May 23, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Chippewa |
Barbara B. Crabb |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 ORDER denying 20 Motion to show good cause or excusable neglect. If petitioner files any additional motions in this case, the clerk of court is directed to docket the motion, which will be deemed denied after 30 days unless the court issues an order to the contrary. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 6/26/2015. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 17 ORDER denying 16 motion to show cause and good cause, to reconsider and for oral argument. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 12/29/2014. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 13 ORDER Construing Notice of Appeal as Request to Proceed ifp. Leave to proceed ifp denied. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/22/2013. (elc),(ps) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case. (PAO). (jef),(ps) |
Filing 5 ORDER dismissing this action. The clerk of court is directed to add the $5 filing fee for this habeas petition to petitioner's outstanding obligations. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/17/2013. (jef),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.