Turner, Brenda v. Schmitt, Donald et al

Defendant: Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Plaintiff: Donald C. Schmitt and Brenda Turner
Case Number: 3:2013cv00531
Filed: July 25, 2013
Court: Wisconsin Western District Court
Office: Madison Office
County: Barron
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 47:0227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Turner, Brenda v. Schmitt, Donald et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.
Represented By: Michael C. Lueder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald C. Schmitt
Represented By: Mary Catherine Fons
Represented By: Ivan Hannibal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenda Turner
Represented By: Ivan Hannibal
Represented By: Mary Catherine Fons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.