Kelly, Andre v. VanVorst, S. et al
| Andre M. Kelly |
| Nurses on 9-11-13, 3 to 11 staff and S. VanVorst |
| 3:2013cv00677 |
| September 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants granting their motion for summary judgment and dismissing the case without prejudice. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. In accordance with Pavey v. Conley, 544 F.3d 739 (7th Cir. 2008), an evidentiary hearing will be held on August 21, 2014 at 9:00 to determine whether plaintiff Andre Kelly exhausted his available admini strative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). The clerk of court is directed to issue a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for plaintiff to appear at the hearing. Plaintiff should arrive at the hearing at least thirty minutes before the hearing is scheduled to begin. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/11/2014. (nln),(ps)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying without prejudice 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant may have until June 6, 2014 to refile and serve a renewed motion. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 5/22/2014. (elc),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
