Gulley, Dominique v. Haines, Timothy et al
Dominique Treymaine Gulley |
Jerome Sweeney, Timothy Haines and David Gardner |
3:2013cv00678 |
September 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Grant |
William M. Conley |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER that this case is dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for want of prosecution. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/22/2014. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 6 ORDER that plaintiff Dominique Treymaine Gulley's request for leave to proceed is DENIED AT THIS TIME. Plaintiff may have until January 13, 2014, to submit evidence demonstrating that he exhausted his administrative remedies, and state whether his transfer to Winnebago occurred during and/or as a result of the administrative process. If plaintiff fails to respond by that date, then the clerk of court is directed to close this case for petitioner's failure to prosecute. If plaintiff submits a revised complaint by that date, the court will take that complaint under advisement for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 12/23/2013. (jef),(ps) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. Initial partial filing fee of $ 0.20 assessed. (Initial partial filing fee due 10/21/2013.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 9/30/2013. (jef),(ps) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.