Naseer, Hakim v. Belz, Thomas et al
| Hakim Naseer |
| Thomas Belz, Gallinger, C/O Wiegel, Mary Miller and Wallance |
| 3:2013cv00821 |
| November 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Grant |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER denying 107 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 7/5/2017. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
106
JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case with prejudice for plaintiff Hakim Naseer's failure to prosecute it. (PAO). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER that plaintiff Hakim Naseer is directed to file his overdue opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment by April 6, 2016. If plaintiff fails to meet this deadline, then I will dismiss this case, with prejudice, for his failure to prosecute it. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 2/23/2016. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER denying 67 Motion to Compel; granting 91 Motion to postpone defendants' motion for summary judgment until the discovery cutoff deadline ; granting 93 Supplemental motion to 91 motion postpone defendants' motion for summar y judgment; denying 95 Motion to Supplement; denying as moot 99 Motion to Stay. Plaintiff's summary judgment opposition due October 13, 2015. Defendants' summary judgment reply due October 26, 2015. Final pretrial submissions and d isclosures due December 11, 2015. Objections due December 31, 2015. Final Pretrial Conference scheduled for January 19, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. Trial scheduled for January 19, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 8/27/2015. (jef),(ps) (jef). Modified on 8/27/2015 (jef).
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER denying 33 Motion for Summary Judgment for Failure to Exhaust. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 2/9/2015. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER denying as moot 1 motion for preliminary injunctive relief; denying as moot 38 Motion for Court to Order GBCI to Provide Notary Services; denying as moot 42 Motion to Stay; denying as moot 47 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 54 Motion for Sanctions; granting 49 Motion to accept plaintiff's materials opposing defendants' motion for summary judgment. Defendants may have until November 11, 2014 to submit a supplemental brief and any evidentiary materials necessary to resolve the issues raised in this order regarding plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Plaintiff many have until November 25, 2014 to submit a supplemental response. The parties may simply refer to attached evidence in their briefs; they need not create new "proposed findings of fact" documents. The dispositive motions deadline is moved to February 20, 2015. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/30/2014. (jef),(ps) Modified on 10/30/2014 (jef).
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying plaintiff's 10 Motion for the court to order defendants to turn over legal mail; 15 Motion for Sanctions; 19 Motion for the court to send a criminal investigation referral to U.S. Attorney's Office concerning proof of U.S. federal mail tampering, and 30 Motion for Court Order directing GBCI to turn over plaintiff's legal property. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 5/15/2014. (jef),(ps) Corrected docket text, 5/16/2014 (jef).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
