Zach, Thomas v. Beahm, Brian et al
| Thomas W. Zach |
| Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Amy Smith, Ismael Ozanne, Tom Gozinske, Todd Johnson, Karen Gourlie, Jeff Pugh, Troy Hermans, Robert Schenck, Brian Beahm and at least one John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 3:2013cv00851 |
| December 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
| Madison Office |
| Dane |
| Barbara B. Crabb |
| Stephen L. Crocker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER Construing Notice of Appeal as Request to Proceed ifp. Leave to proceed ifp denied. Plaintiff's request for court assistance in the recruitment of counsel on appeal, dkt. # 13 , is DENIED without prejudice to his refiling it with the court of appeals. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/18/2014. (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
9
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case for plaintiff's failure to sate a claim upon which relief may be granted. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER that plaintiff Thomas Zach is DENIED leave to proceed on his First Amendment claims regarding mail interference and his due process claims regarding the grievance process. Plaintiff may have until March 27, 2014 to submit an amended complaint more fully explaining the basis for his retaliation claims and his claim regarding being placed in segregation. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/6/2014. (jef),(ps)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
