Perez, Thomas v. Stratton, David et al
Plaintiff: Thomas E. Perez
Defendant: David Stratton, IDS Sales and Engineering, Inc. and IDS Sales and Engineering, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan
Case Number: 3:2014cv00095
Filed: February 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Office: Madison Office
County: Marquette
Presiding Judge: William M. Conley
Presiding Judge: Stephen L. Crocker
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER granting 36 Motion for Default Judgment as to IDS Sales and Engineering, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan and David Stratton. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/13/15. (jat)
May 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER granting 32 Motion for Entry of Default as to Defendants David Stratton and the IDS Sales and Engineering, Inc., Retirement Savings Plan. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court by L. Kamke, Deputy Clerk on 5/13/15. (jat)
April 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 DEFAULT JUDGMENT entered in favor of plaintiff Thomas E. Perez against defendant IDS Sales and Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $19,114.94 and permanently enjoining IDS Sales and Engineering, Inc. from serving as a fiduciary to an employee ben efit plan covered under ERISA except to the extent necessary to carry out this judgment unless IDS has (i) been formally dissolved as a corporate entity, such that no injunction is necessary, or (ii) removed David Stratton and appointed a new, qualified fiduciary. (WMC/PAO) (arw)
April 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting 28 Defendant David Stratton's Motion to Withdraw Answer; granting 22 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant IDS Sales and Engineering, Inc. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 4/23/15. (jat)
January 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting 13 Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default as to IDS Sales and Engineering, Inc.. Signed by Peter A. Oppeneer, Clerk of Court on 1/14/15. (jat) Modified on 1/14/2015 (jat).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez, Thomas v. Stratton, David et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas E. Perez
Represented By: Eileen R. Hurley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Stratton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IDS Sales and Engineering, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IDS Sales and Engineering, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?