U.S. Bank National Association v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
U.S. Bank National Association |
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada |
3:2014cv00562 |
August 13, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin |
Madison Office |
Out of State |
William M. Conley |
Stephen L. Crocker |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 154 JUDGMENT in favor of U.S. Bank National Association against Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada in the amount of $1,842,538.99. (WMC /PAO). (voc) |
Filing 152 ORDER granting supplemental request for attorney fees in the amount of $838,810.23. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in the amount of $1,842,538.99 in favor of plaintiff. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 5/2/2017. (arw) |
Filing 113 ORDER: Defendant Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada's motion to stay discovery order and proceed to immediate hearing on attorneys' fees (dkt. # 104 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The court's discovery order (dkt. # 102 ) is STAYED. Judgement is entered in plaintiff's favor on the subjective prong of the bad faith claim, and the case will proceed to the final, remaining issue of the amount of damages (i.e., attorneys' fees) due as a result of defendant' s bad faith. On or before January 22, 2016, plaintiff shall submit its brief and any supporting materials in support of its request for attorneys' fees, including itemized time records, invoices, and proof of payment of such invoices by U.S. Ba nk. On or before February 12, 2016, defendant shall submit its opposition. If defendant challenges the reasonableness of plaintiff's fee request in that opposition, its counsel shall also contemporaneously submit its itemized time records, invoi ces and proof of payment of such invoices. Plaintiff's reply, if any, is due on or before February 22, 2016. The court will hold a hearing on plaintiff's attorney's fees request, if necessary, after review of the parties' submissions. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 12/22/2015. (voc) |
Filing 103 ORDER denying 65 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings by Defendant Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 10/28/2015. (voc) |
Filing 73 ORDER re: 68 Motion to Stay. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 8/11/2015. (voc) |
Filing 55 ORDER granting 43 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings by Plaintiff U.S. Bank National Association. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 6/9/2015. (voc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: U.S. Bank National Association v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank National Association | |
Represented By: | Eric J. Wilson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.